The Malaysian government levies a high consumption tax on tobacco and alcohol products, and related products contribute more than 2.2 billion ringgit (about NT$14.7 billion) in tax revenue each year . At the same time, the wine industry has also created nearly 66,000 jobs. When the government needs money, it usually adds ” Sin Tax ” to this type of industry, so I don’t think the government will agree to give up this industry. Even if these taxes are indeed replaced by other income, whether banning the sale of alcoholic beverages will solve the problem, the answer is still unknown. The disappearance of alcoholic beverages does not mean that alcohol lovers will also disappear. If the government abandons this industry, it will naturally make the underground alcohol trade more active.

The government still needs to control smuggling activities,

and also give up the tax and employment brought by related industries. Opportunity and investment, I am afraid that the gains will outweigh the losses. Perhaps what the Malaysian government should do is to strengthen publicity and ban, set up a special line for domestic violence, and improve the Norway Phone Number social welfare mechanism, so as to solve related problems more directly. Malaysia Beer Ban Photo Credit: AP/Dazhi Image The picture shows alcoholic beverages sold in a supermarket in Kuala Lumpur. Hype on ethnic and religious issues?This year marks the 50th year that the United Nations has certified the government of the People’s Republic of China to represent China and no longer recognizes the government of the Republic of China to represent China.

It was UN Resolution 2758 passed 50 years ago that

Norway Phone Number

brought to an end the dispute between the government of the Republic of China and the government of the People’s Republic of China over who represents China. Since then, the establishment of diplomatic relations between the People’s Republic of China and other countries in the world has increased rapidly, and the humiliating process of the Republic of China’s “broken diplomatic relations” has also accelerated. After the establishment of diplomatic relations between the United States and China in 1979, the dispute over one China gradually came to an end. Most countries in the world agree that

China is the sole legal representative of the government of the. People’s Republic of China, and there is only one China. But when the Beijing government asserts that Taiwan is part of China. Not most countries agree with it, emphasizing that this is their “own one-China policy.” And this is also the Beijing government’s intention to promote the CCP’s version of the “One China Principle” internationally. Hoping to change the one China policy of various countries and accept Beijing’s One China Principle. Which means the so-called “internationalization of the One China Principle.” Because the key certification for the Beijing government to obtain China’s representation. Is the “United Nations Resolution 2758” passed on October 25, 1971. It’s just that this resolution only involves

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *